In a striking display of dissent within the Republican
ranks, twenty members of the GOP broke ranks and voted against House Judiciary
Chairman Jim Jordan during the first ballot for Speaker of the House on
Tuesday. The defiance left Jordan short of the critical 217 votes required to
clinch the Speakership, garnering only 200 votes in his favo1】. The scenario unfolded despite
former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy’s endorsement of Jordan for the
prestigious position. This rebellion reflects a significant schism within the
party, hinting at a broader ideological battle brewing within the GOP.
The 20 Republicans who defied the party line are as follows:
- Nebraska
Rep. Don Bacon: Voted for former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy.
- Colorado
Rep. Ken Buck: Cast his vote for Majority Whip Tom Emmer.
- Oregon
Rep. Lori Michelle Chavez-DeRemer: Also voted for McCarthy.
- Texas
Rep. Jake Ellzey: Chose California Rep. Mike Garcia.
- New
York Rep. Anthony D’Esposito: Voted for former New York GOP Governor
nominee Lee Zeldin.
- New
York Rep. Andrew Garbarino: Also voted for Zeldin.
- Florida
Rep. Carlos Gimenez: Opted for McCarthy.
- Texas
Rep. Kay Granger: Voted for Scalise.
- Texas
Rep. Tony Gonzalez: Also voted for Scalise.
- Pennsylvania
Rep. Mike Kelley: Chose Scalise as well.
- Virginia
Rep. Jen Kiggans: Cast her vote for McCarthy.
- New
York Rep. Mike Lawler: Also favored McCarthy.
- New
York Rep. Nick LaLota: Opted for Zeldin.
- Florida
Rep. John Rutherford: Voted for Scalise.
- Idaho
Rep. Mike Simpson: Chose Scalise.
- Arkansas
Rep. Steve Womack: Voted for Scalise.
- Indiana
Rep. Victoria Spartz: Cast her vote for Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie.
- California
Rep. Doug LaMalfa: Opted for McCarthy.
- Michigan
Rep. John James: Ended up voting for Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole.
- Florida
Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart: Chose Scalis2】.
This remarkable divergence from party unity showcased the
varying allegiances and perhaps differing ideologies among the party members.
Some aligned with other seasoned leaders within the party, signaling a
potential rift between the traditional GOP establishment and the more conservative
factions represented by Jordan. This vote has not only unveiled the disunity
within the party but also set a precedent for the challenges that lie ahead for
the GOP as they navigate the complex political landscape with a divided house.
The ripple effects of this vote are expected to reverberate
through the GOP's ranks, potentially reshaping the party’s approach towards
unity and consensus building as they gear up for the upcoming electoral
battles. The spotlight now turns to how the Republican party will manage this
internal discord and realign itself to present a united front in the face of a
highly competitive and polarized political arena.
0 Comments