🚨 The Unprecedented Rebellion: 20 GOP Votes Against Jim Jordan Unveiled

 


In a striking display of dissent within the Republican ranks, twenty members of the GOP broke ranks and voted against House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan during the first ballot for Speaker of the House on Tuesday. The defiance left Jordan short of the critical 217 votes required to clinch the Speakership, garnering only 200 votes in his favo​1. The scenario unfolded despite former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy’s endorsement of Jordan for the prestigious position. This rebellion reflects a significant schism within the party, hinting at a broader ideological battle brewing within the GOP.

The 20 Republicans who defied the party line are as follows:

  1. Nebraska Rep. Don Bacon: Voted for former Speaker of the House Kevin McCarthy.
  2. Colorado Rep. Ken Buck: Cast his vote for Majority Whip Tom Emmer.
  3. Oregon Rep. Lori Michelle Chavez-DeRemer: Also voted for McCarthy.
  4. Texas Rep. Jake Ellzey: Chose California Rep. Mike Garcia.
  5. New York Rep. Anthony D’Esposito: Voted for former New York GOP Governor nominee Lee Zeldin.
  6. New York Rep. Andrew Garbarino: Also voted for Zeldin.
  7. Florida Rep. Carlos Gimenez: Opted for McCarthy.
  8. Texas Rep. Kay Granger: Voted for Scalise.
  9. Texas Rep. Tony Gonzalez: Also voted for Scalise.
  10. Pennsylvania Rep. Mike Kelley: Chose Scalise as well.
  11. Virginia Rep. Jen Kiggans: Cast her vote for McCarthy.
  12. New York Rep. Mike Lawler: Also favored McCarthy.
  13. New York Rep. Nick LaLota: Opted for Zeldin.
  14. Florida Rep. John Rutherford: Voted for Scalise.
  15. Idaho Rep. Mike Simpson: Chose Scalise.
  16. Arkansas Rep. Steve Womack: Voted for Scalise.
  17. Indiana Rep. Victoria Spartz: Cast her vote for Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie.
  18. California Rep. Doug LaMalfa: Opted for McCarthy.
  19. Michigan Rep. John James: Ended up voting for Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole.
  20. Florida Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart: Chose Scalis​2.

This remarkable divergence from party unity showcased the varying allegiances and perhaps differing ideologies among the party members. Some aligned with other seasoned leaders within the party, signaling a potential rift between the traditional GOP establishment and the more conservative factions represented by Jordan. This vote has not only unveiled the disunity within the party but also set a precedent for the challenges that lie ahead for the GOP as they navigate the complex political landscape with a divided house.

The ripple effects of this vote are expected to reverberate through the GOP's ranks, potentially reshaping the party’s approach towards unity and consensus building as they gear up for the upcoming electoral battles. The spotlight now turns to how the Republican party will manage this internal discord and realign itself to present a united front in the face of a highly competitive and polarized political arena.

Post a Comment

0 Comments