Former Fox 10 News anchor Kari Lake has announced her candidacy for governor of Arizona, hoping to unseat incumbent Doug Ducey. However, she has come under fire from AZCentral columnist Elvia Diaz after suggesting that God had chosen her to be governor.
Diaz wrote an op-ed titled “Kari Lake is a dangerous liar. Don’t believe her for a second,” in which she labels Lake a “false prophet” and claims that her religious rhetoric is a thinly-veiled attempt to win over the conservative base of the Republican Party.
Diaz argues that Lake’s comments about God choosing her to be governor are not only offensive to religious people but also reveal her lack of qualifications for the job. Diaz states that Lake has no previous political experience and has been known to make controversial and offensive remarks during her time as a news anchor.
The Danger of Religious Rhetoric in Politics
The use of religious rhetoric in politics is not a new phenomenon. Politicians have been invoking God and religion for centuries to win over voters and gain support for their policies. However, the danger of this tactic lies in the fact that it can be used to manipulate people’s beliefs and emotions, often leading to irrational decision-making.
When a politician claims to have been chosen by God to hold a position of power, they are essentially claiming that they are infallible and above criticism. This can lead to a dangerous cult of personality, where the leader’s word is taken as gospel and any dissenting voices are silenced.
Furthermore, the use of religious rhetoric can be divisive, as it often excludes those who do not share the same beliefs. In a diverse society like the United States, it is important for politicians to represent all of their constituents, regardless of their religious affiliation.
Kari Lake’s Controversial Past
One of the main arguments against Kari Lake’s candidacy for governor is her controversial past as a news anchor. During her time at Fox 10 News, Lake was known for making controversial and offensive remarks on air.
In one instance, she referred to the Black Lives Matter movement as a “terrorist organization” and claimed that the media was “covering up” the truth about police shootings of black people. In another instance, she referred to the COVID-19 pandemic as a “scamdemic” and promoted unproven treatments for the virus.
These statements have led many to question Lake’s judgment and fitness for public office. If she is willing to make such controversial remarks as a news anchor, what kind of statements might she make as a governor?
The Need for Qualified Candidates
Ultimately, the controversy surrounding Kari Lake’s candidacy for governor highlights the need for qualified candidates in public office. While it is certainly possible for someone without political experience to be a successful leader, it is important that they have the necessary skills and qualifications to do the job.
Running for governor simply because one believes they have been chosen by God is not a qualification. Candidates must have a clear vision for the future of their state and a plan to achieve their goals. They must also be able to work with others and navigate the complex world of politics.
By focusing on qualifications rather than religious rhetoric, voters can ensure that their elected officials are capable of making informed, rational decisions that benefit everyone.
Conclusion
Kari Lake’s comments about God choosing her to be governor have sparked controversy and criticism from many, including AZCentral columnist Elvia Diaz. While the use of religious rhetoric in politics is not new, it can be divisive and dangerous, leading to irrational decision-making and a cult of personality.
Furthermore, Kari Lake’s controversial past as a news anchor has led many to question her judgment and fitness for public office. Ultimately, the controversy surrounding her candidacy highlights the need for qualified candidates in public office who have the necessary skills and qualifications to lead.
0 Comments